Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

The E.A.R.T.H Principle: How to Run an Enterprise Analytics Team with Less … and Stay Sane

Recently, I worked for a large financial institution on the client side, leading a global enterprise-wide team that served 12 million customers and more than 46,000 employees. My team focused on digital analytics; there were other teams actively using digital data, but we were the digital data product owners.   

My team consisted of just seven people serving more than 900 direct users of the data. Two thousand dashboards and nearly 900 KPIs later, our team had an internal NPS score of 50 without doing overtime. How did we accomplish this?

While leading that team, I developed the E.A.R.T.H acronym to meet two objectives:

  1. Successfully run an enterprise analytics team with less resources
  2. Keep my sanity! 

Five Principles for Efficient and Valued Digital Analytics 

  • Empathy
  • Automate
  • Relentless
  • Transparency 
  • Harmony 

History

Following an internal reorganization, our team moved from the marketing department, where it was established six years earlier, to the larger digital channels division. This shift promptly caused us to become a global, enterprise-wide team. 

In short, our responsibility quadrupled—and we had to work even quicker than before for our clients. 

Most importantly, our resourcing (team size) did not change. With potentially the entire enterprise now in our mandate, how could we avoid a future of unending and  overwhelming ad-hoc requests? 

We are analysts … so we analyzed the problem. 

Figure Out Where You Are to Get Where You Need to Be 

We sifted through the information we had to truly understand our current status and evolving future state. We then looked at project tracking and intake logs (if you are using Jira or other project management tools, this is an excellent place to begin to understand your intake). Additionally (or worst case in lieu of intake) we looked at meeting logs, downloaded our calendars, and categorized the meeting blocks. All email exchanges were categorized for a year. Finally, we downloaded the user access logs of the self-service tools we managed and cross referenced them against the new teams.

Next, because the previous data sources were backward-looking, we also wanted to understand the new landscape by:

  • Surveying all existing users of data and new teams we identified as potential power users 
  • Creating contemporaneous notes of interactions, conversations, meetings, corridor convos, and “running into that guy in Starbucks” chatter 
  • A nice mix of quantitative and qualitative data 

Principle One: Empathy 

To fulfill the needs of your customers and move the team vision forward, you must understand the needs of your customers from their perspective. 

It is easy, especially when we are swamped, to criticize the behavior of others. But looking empathetically at the problem uncovers dysfunctional incentives and gives you the power to change behavior.

Remember, we already have:

  • Analyzed user activity 
  • Categorized the FAQ that came in via email 
  • Examined ad-hoc requests coming in
  • Surveyed our user base including verbatim
  • Collected quantitative and qualitative data to understand our customer base

We took this data and asked six very basic questions of it:

1. Who is asking questions of the data and team and who is not

This helped us identify which teams are going in and interacting with the database, and who was conspicuously absent. 

2. What are they asking? What are they doing with the data?

Was it clear what the request was for? Can we elevate the data request to be more efficient and effective?

3. When are they asking? 

It might seem obvious, but is there a predictable cadence here to help us plan for spikes?

4. Where are they in the organization chart? Product? Marketing? Design? 

What about their position could inform us of their data needs, and why? Again, is there a published cadence, product roadmap, or something else we could plug into? 

5. Why are they asking in that way? 

Are they asking for the same “quick number” over and over? Could that be automated? Are they overcomplicating the ask? It’s important to try to understand where they’re coming from when they ask questions.

6. How valuable is this deliverable to the overall organization’s objectives?

As subject matter experts, we needed to focus our hours on high-value work, whereas “nice-to-haves” had to be self-serve. 

Principal Two: Automate 

Find all “copying and pasting” activity and stop it. Revisit current tools and max out their automation capabilities. 

QA via tools like Tag Inspector can free up thousands of hours of analysts’ time. 

Even Microsoft Excel can be more efficient. Ensure your team understands every aspect of tools like VLOOKUP, Power BI, and API plugins—and then use them all.

“Copy & paste” is your business case for a new solution. Reach out to the community via DAA, Slack, Twitter, or LinkedIn and reach out to your internal community of similar teams. Your problem is rarely unique; there is a solution, so do not settle.

Principal Three: Relentless 

Be ruthless in critiquing how the team works. For example, I have a philosophy that a regularly produced report that creates ad-hocs is a failure.

The Good
  • Build and evolve your reporting 
  • Facilitate knowledge building 
  • Align with your expertise either in complexity or time
  • Align clearly with a decision and outcome 

Good ad-hocs act as bespoke analysis or needed revisions of a living process. 

The Bad
  • Variations on data in your report that are “special snowflakes”
  • No clear alignment with overall business decisions and outcomes 
  • Should be self-serve 

Bad ad-hocs need to direct requester to self serve or refine request to be a “good ad-hoc”. 

The Ugly

  • Might require some escalation or a tough conversation 
  • Unrealistic delivery timeline
  • Use relationships to jump the queue 
  • Obscure reasoning 

Principal Four: Transparency  

I am a huge fan of public-facing tools outlining your workflow. Project management tools like Jira and Asana allow stakeholders to self-serve the answers to the question: are you busy or just mismanaging your time?

Transparency prevents a dysfunctional appearance and facilitates an unemotional, priority-focused allocation of resources. It is also useful for building business cases for additional staffing or tools to boost capacity that is measurable and seen as impactful to the business. 

Principal Five: Harmony

Once you have an understanding of your users, have empowered them, and democratized your intake process, you then can work to make the team as balanced as possible.

A balanced team is critical, so it’s important to hire the best of the best. Here are some qualities all teams should value:

  • Share the same sheet music – Shared, clear goals allow a lean team to have direction, autonomy, ownership, and purpose in their working lives 
  • Cast for passion – Understanding where each team member aspires to go in their career allows you to align projects to those goals ensuring mutual benefits and high retention 
  • Teams should be safe, supportive, and respectful
  • Shared vision for future
  • Remove obstacles – As a leader, it’s your job to remove obstacles to success, from slow computers to combative stakeholders 
  • Ban invisible work – absolutely ZERO overtime. This only works with transparency of resource allocation; however, consistent overtime is a red flag as a leader and needs to be stopped as soon as possible. 

Looking to Reach Out to InfoTrust?

Our analysts and engineers are here to field your questions and help your organization advance its digital maturity.
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

Other Articles You Will Enjoy

Server-Side Sans GTM: You’ve Got Options

Server-Side Sans GTM: You’ve Got Options

When Google releases a new product, there is always an inevitable amount of hype—and server-side GTM (Google Tag Manager) has been no exception. As…

Clean Your Data Like a Sleuth Detective

Clean Your Data Like a Sleuth Detective

Audit, clean, rinse, repeat. Sometimes it feels like all we do is look at data and optimize scrub-scrub in an obsessive-compulsive fashion. “Just one…

How Advertisers Should Plan for Activation in a Reduced Cookie World

How Advertisers Should Plan for Activation in a Reduced Cookie World

By now, you’ve likely heard Google Chrome will be removing the ability to use third-party cookies in 2022. Safari and Firefox have already removed…

Back to the Basics: Google Analytics 4

Back to the Basics: Google Analytics 4

Google Analytics 4, GA4, and Google App + Web: With different terms being thrown around regarding Google Analytics’ latest update, what it can do,…

The Key to Cracking the Cookieless World Is in the Cloud, but Can You Find It?

The Key to Cracking the Cookieless World Is in the Cloud, but Can You Find It?

In the past, when a customer visited your site, looked at a product, and navigated away, even if they never explicitly identified themselves, you…

Performance Is Not at Odds with Privacy: Lessons I Learned from Sean Downey, Google’s VP of Platforms, at InfoTrust’s Durability Summit

Performance Is Not at Odds with Privacy: Lessons I Learned from Sean Downey, Google’s VP of Platforms, at InfoTrust’s Durability Summit

In June, InfoTrust hosted a Durability Summit, where we discussed what it means to build a sustainable digital analytics marketing practice, considering all the…

Win the Holiday Season with Data-Driven Decisions

Win the Holiday Season with Data-Driven Decisions

With the holiday season approaching and the increasing shifts in shopping patterns amidst the continued pandemic, what are your teams doing to prepare and…

What is Google Analytics 360 and Who Should Consider Purchasing a License?

What is Google Analytics 360 and Who Should Consider Purchasing a License?

It’s 2021 and when it comes to analytics, as a marketing leader you’ve got expectations. You’re not looking for something casual—you want the real…

How Does Google Data Studio Compare to Looker?

How Does Google Data Studio Compare to Looker?

Google Data Studio is a fairly prevalent tool for organizations using the Google marketing and analytics stack. Not only is Data Studio simple, free…

Talk To Us

Talk To Us

Receive Book Updates

Fill out this form to receive email announcements about Crawl, Walk, Run: Advancing Analytics Maturity with Google Marketing Platform. This includes pre-sale dates, official publishing dates, and more.

Our website uses cookies and may collect user information to provide a good experience. Read our Privacy Policy here.

Leave Us A Review

Leave a review and let us know how we’re doing. Only actual clients, please.